Of the back of my Nuremberg Code article, some have been asking whether there is a legal basis for papers to have be served to Colchester Hospital
FYI I am not a lawyer, I just like researching random facts on the internet
Is The Nuremberg Code Legally Binding?
Let’s see…
Well, in a nutshell, no it’s not
(sorry to disappoint)
The code is an “ethical framework”
That means it’s stuff you SHOULD be doing, not stuff you HAVE to do
Even if it were legally binding, the Nuremberg Code would only apply in Germany where it was codified
It was never adopted formally by the UK or, as far as I can tell, any other Government
And even Germany didn’t put it into formal law
It’s not legally enforceable
So in this respect, the Covidiots don’t really have a legal leg to stand on
Also, interestingly, the Nuremberg Code only applies to active experimentation on humans so does not apply once the vaccine has been rolled out
But We ARE Being Experimented On, Right?
Hold on, hold on, I know what you’re going to say…
The Covid Vaccine is NOT under active human experimentation
It has come out of clinical trials and has been approved for use by the varying health bodies in different countries
You’re going to argue that we’re *still* being experimented on
This is untrue….
As I mentioned in my previous thread, the COVID-SARS2 vaccines are based on existing SARS vaccines that have been trialled for decades
No “experiments” were needed, they just needed to collect data about how effective the vaccine was…
We’re still in the data collecting stage
Not an experimental stage
The vaccine is approved, no experiments are needed
What they do need is data on how well it is doing in a real-world scenario and any side effects that may occur outside of a clinical trial environment…
Your next argument will probably be “Well if there are side effects, they must still be experimenting so it’s a breach of the Nuremberg code Ha Ha!”
No.
People take drugs for all different things and different drugs react differently with each other….
They can’t possibly test for ALL combinations of EVERY drug everyone on the planet takes
Data, Data, Data
That’s where the DATA COLLECTION comes in
It’s still not experimentation
Now for your next argument… vaccine passports
The Nuremberg Code never once mentioned the curtailment of free movement through vaccine passports
Something else that’s legally binding does but we’ll get to that in a minute…
While you could argue that the Nuremberg code references “consent” this is in relation to scientific experimentation
What it does not cover is you getting in a hissy fit because you have to show an app or bit of paper to get into your local Nandos
Vaccine passports are policy documents and there use is decided upon by the government, not the scientists who abide by the Nuremberg Code
So basically the Nuremberg code was only ever relevant during the research and trial phase
And then it would only apply to the Pharma companies completing those trials
The NHS has nothing at all to do with the Nuremberg Code, they are merely supplying the vaccine, the were/are not part of the experimental phase
So, I mentioned earlier that there was something the Covidiots could have used to make an actual legal case
What is it?
The Human Rights Act 1998
What Is The Human Rights Act?
The Human Rights Act enshrines into law certain freedoms that we can all expect like the right to life and the right to a fair trial
So let’s have a look at it, shall we?
You might want to grab a cup of tea…☕️
Medical treatment is spread across a few of the Articles of the HRA. Most relvant are
Article 2 – the right to life
Article 3 – the right not to be subjected to degrading treatment
Article 5 – the right to liberty
Article 8 – the right to respect for an individual’s private life
Article 14 – The right not to be discriminated against
So the people who served papers should have used the Human Rights act and claimed that the NHS is in breach of the above articles
However I suspect they don’t like the HRA and want it dropped as it’s “soft on criminals ”
BUT
This is where it gets interesting (and it wouldn’t be one of my twitter threads without a plot twist)
They may claim that Article 5 “The Right To Liberty” is lost as they can’t go anywhere without a vaccine (or passport in some cases)
But No! They’d be wrong
While the Human Rights Act gives the right of liberty, there are some caveats, one of them being if you’re a criminal (kind of obvious) so you can be detained if you have committed a crime, are on bail, need to be detained due to mental health issues etc
But here’s the fun bit..
Drum roll please
The following is also in Article 5 of The Human Rights Act:
the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases, of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants
So you can legally be locked up if you’re a risk of spreading Covid and there is nothing you can do about it apart from appeal
So even if the Covidiots served papers complaining of a breach of the Human Rights act instead of incorrectly using the Nuremberg Code….
They could still legally be locked up if the Government believed they were a risk to public health
These guys really should have done their research before chucking a load of brown envelopes at a poor NHS worker
Editor’s Note: This article was originally a Twitter thread posted on the 21st October 2021. You can view the original series of tweets here
Katy is the editor-in-chief of FlippingHeck.com a blog about Self-Improvement, Productivity and Small Business Tips. When she’s not working, she enjoys gaming, making music and Reviewing Things.
Can You Support Katy's Work?
If you are able to, it would be great if you could make a donation. Your donations will go towards covering hosting costs as well as enabling me to continue my research and provide explainers to everyone.
